Civil Rights & Police Misconduct
Wisconsin Jail Failure to Protect Lawyers
Jails Must Protect the People in Their Custody from Violence
Jails Must Protect the People in Their Custody from Violence
People who are incarcerated cannot choose their surroundings, avoid dangerous individuals, or call for help on their own. Because the state strips them of the ability to protect themselves, the Constitution requires correctional staff to take reasonable steps to protect them from violence at the hands of other inmates. The Supreme Court held in Farmer v. Brennan that officials violate the Eighth Amendment when they are deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of serious harm to a detainee.
Strang Bradley represents people across Wisconsin who were seriously injured — and the families of those killed — because jail or prison staff ignored a known danger. We hold those officials and their institutions accountable.
What Failure to Protect Looks Like
- Housing a vulnerable detainee with a known violent or predatory inmate
- Ignoring explicit threats or repeated requests for protective custody
- Failing to separate rival groups or known enemies
- Inadequate supervision, monitoring, or cell checks that allow assaults to occur
- Understaffing that leaves dangerous areas unwatched
- Ignoring a clear and documented pattern of violence in a unit
- Failing to intervene during an assault that staff could see or hear
What to Do After a Failure-to-Protect Injury
- Seek immediate medical care and ensure all injuries are fully documented.
- Preserve any grievances, requests for protective custody, or written warnings made before the assault.
- Request preservation of surveillance footage, housing and classification records, incident reports, and staffing logs.
- Identify witnesses — both detainees and staff — to what happened and to any prior warnings.
- File any necessary notices of claims that may apply.
- Contact a civil rights attorney promptly to preserve evidence and deadlines.
Constitutional and Wisconsin Law
Failure-to-protect claims are brought under the Eighth Amendment (convicted prisoners) or the Fourteenth Amendment (pretrial detainees) through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The county or municipality may be liable under Monell where the harm reflects a policy, inadequate staffing or training, or a pattern of ignoring inmate safety. Where an assault is fatal, Wisconsin’s wrongful death law (Wis. Stat. § 895.03) may provide additional claims.
Compensation You May Be Entitled To From A Failure-to-Protect Claim
- Medical expenses and future care
- Lost wages and earning capacity
- Pain, suffering, and psychological trauma
- Compensation for the constitutional violation itself
- Punitive damages against individuals in egregious cases
- Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Why Choose Strang Bradley for a Failure-to-Protect Case
Proving what staff knew before an assault requires digging into classification files, grievance histories, and staffing records the institution would rather keep buried. Our attorneys know how to obtain and analyze those records, depose correctional staff, retain corrections experts, and present these cases to juries with the seriousness they demand.
Strang Bradley’s History of Winning Jail Failure to Protect Cases
A selection of the Jail Failure to Protect cases the firm has recently filed, won on summary judgment, and obtained judgments in.
Recent Cases Filed
-
Summers v. Dunahay et al
No. 3:25-CV-00324 (W.D. Wis.)
Date Case Filed: 4/25/25
Defendants: Erin Dunahay, Elizabeth Tegels, Casey Jensen, Jeremiah Curtis, Kristine Smetana, James Nyhus, Nicholas Klimpke, and Blake Weikel
Claims:- Count 1: Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect
- Count 2: Eighth Amendment Failure to Protect
In the news
-
55 Swatting Calls: A Couple’s Fight Against Online Stalkers and the Police
The city of Milwaukee agreed to a $575,000 settlement after months of heavily armed police responses to 911 calls to the couple’s home that officials knew were hoaxes.
John Bradley, a lawyer for the couple, acknowledged that the Milwaukee police “did their job on the first few swatting calls.”
“The problem,” he added, “came after it had happened dozens of times.”
-
Wisconsin police chief sued 3x, accused of unconstitutional stops
A sheriff’s deputy and small-town police chief, Brendan Cutrell, is the subject of three federal lawsuits alleging he violated the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals he pulled over.
-
TMJ4 Lighthouse Investigation – City of Milwaukee Settles $575,000 Swatting Lawsuit
TMJ4's Investigative Report about the City of Milwaukee Settling a Civil Rights Lawsuit by Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson for $575,000 For MPD's Relentless Swatting of Their Home.
-
Milwaukee couple reaches $575,000 settlement with city after repeated swatting responses
After years of harassment, frustration, and danger, a Milwaukee couple is poised to receive a settlement payment from the City of Milwaukee. The city has agreed to pay the $575,000 settlement for not properly training 20 officers involved.
-
City may pay $575,000 to settle MPD ‘swatting’ lawsuit involving local author
Milwaukee City Attorney Evan Goyke is recommending that the city pay more than half a million dollars to settle a federal lawsuit over the Milwaukee Police Department repeatedly entering and searching a local author’s home in response to false 911 calls.
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man on federal charges after posting TikTok videos
CNN has reached out to Stanton’s attorney for comment.
In a statement to the New York Times, John Bradley, a lawyer for Stanton, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man facing federal charges related to ICE agents
In a statement, John Bradley, a lawyer for Mr. Stanton, a Marine Corps veteran who served in the Iraq War, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
County, city, several officers named in civil rights lawsuit
A Rhinelander man has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, alleging seven Oneida County sheriff’s deputies and two city police officers violated his civil rights by engaging in an illegal search and seizure, unreasonable extension of seizure, unlawful arrest and failure to intervene.
-
Shorewood woman receives $760K civil rights settlement from City of Milwaukee
Stephanie Rapkin has been awarded a $760,000 settlement after suing Shorewood and Whitefish Bay over her arrest in 2020 where police conducted a search of her home without a warrant. “To our knowledge, this is the largest police misconduct civil rights settlement in Wisconsin that doesn’t involve a death or serious injury,” John Bradley, one of Rapkin’s attorneys, told the Journal Sentinel.
Our Team
Strang Bradley’s Civil Rights Lawyers
Answers
Jail Failure to Protect FAQs
-
Isn't violence in jail unavoidable?
Some risk exists, but officials still must take reasonable steps to protect detainees. When staff ignore a known, substantial risk — like a documented threat or a request for protective custody — and serious harm results, that can be a constitutional violation.
-
What if my family member warned staff before the attack?
That may be powerful evidence. Prior threats, grievances, or requests for protection help establish that officials knew of the danger and disregarded it.
-
How long do we have to act?
Move quickly. Evidence can disappear, and some claims require you to give notice to the government.
Were you injured in jail? Let’s talk.
Consultations are free and confidential. Tell us what happened and we will tell you how we can help.
