Civil Rights & Police Misconduct
Wisconsin Illegal Blood Draw Lawyers
The Government Cannot Unreasonably Draw Your Blood
When Police Use Force Unlawfully, You Deserve Justice
A blood draw is a Fourth Amendment search. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Missouri v. McNeely that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not automatically create an exigency that justifies a warrantless blood draw — police generally must obtain a warrant. When officers draw blood without a valid warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement, they violate your constitutional rights.
Wisconsin’s implied consent law has specific requirements, and when law enforcement oversteps them — using force, coercion, or ignoring refusal rights — the blood draw may be both unlawful and the basis for a civil rights claim. Strang Bradley represents people throughout Wisconsin in these cases
What Makes a Blood Draw Illegal?
- Blood drawn without a warrant in a non-emergency situation
- Blood drawn by force or physical restraint without consent and without a warrant
- Blood drawn after you clearly refused and no warrant was obtained
- Coercion — threatening arrest, charges, or other consequences to obtain purported ‘consent’ that was not truly voluntary
The Criminal Case and the Civil Rights Case
If you were charged with OWI or another crime based on an illegal blood draw, suppression of the blood test results is a critical issue in your criminal case. But the forced or unlawful blood draw is also an independent Fourth Amendment violation for which you may pursue civil damages — regardless of the outcome of any criminal proceedings.
What to Do If You Were Subjected to an Illegal Blood Draw
- Seek medical attention if the blood draw caused injury, infection, bruising, or nerve damage. Document all injuries.
- Write down everything you remember: what officers said, whether you consented or refused, who performed the draw, and the conditions.
- Contact a civil rights attorney promptly to evaluate your constitutional claim and preserve notice deadlines.
Constitutional and Wisconsin Law
Illegal blood draw claims proceed under the Fourth Amendment through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Wisconsin’s implied consent statute (Wis. Stat. § 343.305) governs the procedural aspects of blood draws in the OWI context, and violations of its requirements can support both suppression in the criminal case and civil liability.
Compensation You May Be Entitled To From An Illegal Blood Draw
- Physical injuries caused by the blood draw (bruising, nerve damage, infection)
- Emotional distress, trauma, and violation of bodily autonomy
- Compensation for the constitutional violation itself
- Punitive damages in cases involving deliberate disregard of your rights
- Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Why Choose Strang Bradley for Your Illegal Blood Draw Case
Our attorneys have handled the intersection of criminal defense and civil rights law for years. We understand the Fourth Amendment standards governing bodily searches in depth, the specific Wisconsin implied consent framework, and how to pursue accountability for officers who overstep their authority. If your blood was taken illegally, we want to hear from you.
Strang Bradley’s History of Winning Blood Draw Cases
A selection of blood draw cases the firm has recently filed, won on summary judgment, and obtained judgments in.
Summary Judgment Wins
-
Voegeli v. City of Janesville
No. 3:20-cv-00845 (W.D. Wis.)
Defendants: County of Rock, City of Janesville, Vincent Lemery, Kevin Skatrud
Date of Summary Judgment Decision: 10/1/21
Won Warrantless Blood Draw and Failure to Intervene. Judge James D. Peterson concluded the officers violated the plaintiff’s 4th Amendment rights.
In the news
-
55 Swatting Calls: A Couple’s Fight Against Online Stalkers and the Police
The city of Milwaukee agreed to a $575,000 settlement after months of heavily armed police responses to 911 calls to the couple’s home that officials knew were hoaxes.
John Bradley, a lawyer for the couple, acknowledged that the Milwaukee police “did their job on the first few swatting calls.”
“The problem,” he added, “came after it had happened dozens of times.”
-
Wisconsin police chief sued 3x, accused of unconstitutional stops
A sheriff’s deputy and small-town police chief, Brendan Cutrell, is the subject of three federal lawsuits alleging he violated the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals he pulled over.
-
TMJ4 Lighthouse Investigation – City of Milwaukee Settles $575,000 Swatting Lawsuit
TMJ4's Investigative Report about the City of Milwaukee Settling a Civil Rights Lawsuit by Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson for $575,000 For MPD's Relentless Swatting of Their Home.
-
Milwaukee couple reaches $575,000 settlement with city after repeated swatting responses
After years of harassment, frustration, and danger, a Milwaukee couple is poised to receive a settlement payment from the City of Milwaukee. The city has agreed to pay the $575,000 settlement for not properly training 20 officers involved.
-
City may pay $575,000 to settle MPD ‘swatting’ lawsuit involving local author
Milwaukee City Attorney Evan Goyke is recommending that the city pay more than half a million dollars to settle a federal lawsuit over the Milwaukee Police Department repeatedly entering and searching a local author’s home in response to false 911 calls.
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man on federal charges after posting TikTok videos
CNN has reached out to Stanton’s attorney for comment.
In a statement to the New York Times, John Bradley, a lawyer for Stanton, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man facing federal charges related to ICE agents
In a statement, John Bradley, a lawyer for Mr. Stanton, a Marine Corps veteran who served in the Iraq War, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
County, city, several officers named in civil rights lawsuit
A Rhinelander man has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, alleging seven Oneida County sheriff’s deputies and two city police officers violated his civil rights by engaging in an illegal search and seizure, unreasonable extension of seizure, unlawful arrest and failure to intervene.
-
Shorewood woman receives $760K civil rights settlement from City of Milwaukee
Stephanie Rapkin has been awarded a $760,000 settlement after suing Shorewood and Whitefish Bay over her arrest in 2020 where police conducted a search of her home without a warrant. “To our knowledge, this is the largest police misconduct civil rights settlement in Wisconsin that doesn’t involve a death or serious injury,” John Bradley, one of Rapkin’s attorneys, told the Journal Sentinel.
Our Team
Strang Bradley’s Civil Rights Lawyers
Answers
Illegal Blood Draw FAQs
-
Can police take my blood without a warrant?
Usually not. Under Missouri v. McNeely, the natural dissipation of alcohol does not automatically justify a warrantless draw — police generally need a warrant; genuine, voluntary consent; or an actual emergency.
-
I refused but they drew my blood anyway. Do I have a claim?
Possibly. A forced draw without a warrant or valid consent can violate the Fourth Amendment, separate from your OWI case
-
Does this affect my criminal case too?
Yes. An illegal blood draw can be challenged for suppression in the criminal case, while the civil rights claim proceeds separately.
Did the Police Unreasonably Search You? Let’s talk.
Consultations are free and confidential. Tell us what happened and we will tell you how we can help.
