Civil Rights & Police Misconduct

Wisconsin Illegal School Search Lawyers

Students Do Not Leave Their Constitutional Rights at the School Door

Students Do Not Leave Their Constitutional Rights at the School Door

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court famously held that students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter a school. This is true for searches: the Fourth Amendment applies in schools, though the standard is somewhat different from the standard that applies to police. School officials must have individualized ‘reasonable suspicion’ — rather than probable cause — that a student has violated school rules or the law before conducting a search. But this is still a real threshold, and when officials ignore it, students and their families can hold them accountable.

Strang Bradley represents students and families across Wisconsin when school officials overstep their authority through unlawful, invasive, or discriminatory searches.

What Makes a School Search Illegal?

  • A search based on a hunch, a stereotype, or belief rather than individualized reasonable suspicion
  • Strip searches or highly intrusive searches of students’ bodies — the Supreme Court found these presumptively unconstitutional absent specific, serious circumstances (Safford Unified School District v. Redding)
  • Searches of personal devices (phones, laptops) without individualized reasonable suspicion
  • Mass or blanket searches of all students in a class or school without individualized basis
  • Searches conducted by police officers on school grounds, which are subject to the higher probable cause standard rather than the school’s reasonable suspicion standard
  • Searches carried out in a humiliating, degrading, or retaliatory manner

Strip Searches of Students

Strip searches and invasive body searches of students deserve special attention. In Safford Unified School District v. Redding, the Supreme Court held that a strip search of a 13-year-old student based solely on a classmate’s accusation that she had ibuprofen was unconstitutional. The Court emphasized that the intrusiveness of the search must be proportionate to the severity of the suspected infraction and the danger it posed. Strip searches of students in Wisconsin schools are almost never constitutionally justified.

When School Resource Officers Are Involved

When a School Resource Officer (SRO) — a sworn law enforcement officer — conducts or participates in a search, the higher probable cause Fourth Amendment standard that apply to police generally govern the search, not the lower reasonable suspicion standard for school administrators. This distinction is important, and students’ rights in that context are significantly stronger.

What to Do If Your Child Was Subjected to an Illegal School Search

  1. Talk with your child about exactly what happened — who conducted the search, what was searched, who was present, and what justification (if any) was given.
  2. Document any physical or emotional harm your child suffered as a result.
  3. Contact a civil rights attorney promptly to evaluate the constitutional claim and the available remedies.
  4. If school discipline is pending against your child, contest it — an unlawful search generally cannot lawfully form the basis for discipline.

Constitutional and Wisconsin Law

Illegal school search claims are brought under the Fourth Amendment through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The school district may bear Monell liability if unlawful search practices reflect a policy or widespread practice. In particularly egregious cases — especially strip searches — punitive damages against the individual officials may be available.

Compensation That May Be Available From An Illegal School Search

  • Emotional distress and psychological harm suffered by the student
  • Physical harm resulting from the search
  • Compensation for the constitutional violation itself
  • Punitive damages against individual officials in cases of reckless disregard for constitutional rights
  • Injunctive relief — a court order requiring the school to change its practices
  • Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Why Choose Strang Bradley for a Students’ Rights Case

Schools are not above the Constitution. When administrators or police officers violate students’ Fourth Amendment rights — particularly in cases involving body searches of children — accountability matters enormously, both for the individual student and for the broader culture of rights in our schools. Our attorneys are committed to standing up for students and families who have been treated as though their rights do not matter.

Strang Bradley’s History of School Search Cases

A selection of the school search cases the firm has recently filed, won on summary judgment, and obtained judgments in.

Judgments Obtained

  • M.N. (minor) v. Monona Grove School District et al

    No. 22-cv-289-jdp (W.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 5/23/22

    Date of Judgment: June 20, 2023

    Judgment entered for plaintiff M.N. (minor) against the Monona Grove School District, Molly Rilling, Tanya Greene, Scott Groff, and Emily Hunn.

    View Filed Complaint View Judgment

In the news

Strang Bradley’s School Search Civil Rights Cases

A selection of Strang Bradley’s School Search Civil Rights Cases that have been covered in the media.

Answers

Illegal School Search FAQs

  • Can a school search my child without probable cause?

    School officials need 'reasonable suspicion,' a lower bar than police probable cause — but it is still a real threshold. A hunch is not enough.

  • Are strip searches of students legal?

    Rarely. In Safford v. Redding, the Supreme Court found a student strip search over suspected ibuprofen unconstitutional. These searches are very rarely justified.

  • What if a police officer (SRO) did the search?

    When a sworn officer conducts the search, the higher police probable cause standard generally applies, giving your child stronger protection.

Was a loved hurt by the police? Let’s talk.

Consultations are free and confidential. Tell us what happened and we will tell you how we can help.