Civil Rights & Police Misconduct
Wisconsin Wrongful Conviction Lawyers
Wrongful Conviction Is a Profound Injustice — and Those Responsible Must Be Held Accountable
Wrongful Conviction Is a Profound Injustice — and Those Responsible Must Be Held Accountable
Thousands of people in the United States have been exonerated after serving years — sometimes decades — in prison for crimes they did not commit. Behind most wrongful convictions is a failure of the system: fabricated evidence, Brady violations (prosecutors withholding exculpatory information), coerced confessions, false eyewitness identifications, or junk forensic science. At Strang Bradley, we fight to free the wrongfully convicted and, when they are exonerated, to recover everything the system took from them.
Strang Bradley attorney Dean Strang’s work on the Steven Avery case — documented in Making a Murderer — brought national attention to the real and devastating consequences of wrongful conviction in Wisconsin. This firm’s commitment to justice for the wrongfully accused is at the core of who we are.
Common Causes of Wrongful Convictions
- Brady violations — prosecutors failing to disclose evidence favorable to the defense
- Police or prosecutorial misconduct — fabricating or planting evidence
- False or coerced confessions, including those obtained from juveniles or people with cognitive disabilities
- Eyewitness misidentification — the leading cause of wrongful convictions nationally
- Flawed or discredited forensic science (bite marks, hair analysis, blood spatter)
- Jailhouse informants providing false testimony in exchange for consideration
- Bias at any stage of the investigation or prosecution
The Path to Overturning a Wrongful Conviction
Post-conviction relief in Wisconsin may be available through several pathways, depending on the nature of the error:
- Direct appeal (if still within the appeal window)
- Motion for post-conviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06, based on newly discovered evidence or constitutional violations
- DNA testing petitions (Wis. Stat. § 974.07) — available even after a conviction is final
- Federal habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Civil Rights Claims After Exoneration
Exoneration opens the door to civil claims against the individuals and institutions responsible for the wrongful conviction:
- Section 1983 claims for fabrication of evidence, coerced confessions, or malicious prosecution
- Brady violation claims (where prosecutorial immunity does not apply to investigative conduct)
- Claims against detectives and officers who manufactured evidence or withheld it
Compensation You May Be Entitled To From A Wrongful Conviction
- Federal civil rights damages for fabricated evidence, coerced confessions, or malicious prosecution
- Lost wages and lost earning capacity
- Emotional distress and psychological harm from incarceration
- Damage to family relationships, including loss of time with children
- Punitive damages against individual officers or prosecutors in appropriate cases
- Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Why Choose Strang Bradley for a Wrongful Conviction Case
This is not an area where you want a generalist. Wrongful conviction cases require mastery of post-conviction procedure, deep knowledge of Brady doctrine and prosecutorial misconduct law, the ability to investigate systemic failures, and the determination to fight institutions that will resist at every step. Our attorneys have been fighting for the wrongfully accused for their entire careers. It is personal for us.
In the news
-
55 Swatting Calls: A Couple’s Fight Against Online Stalkers and the Police
The city of Milwaukee agreed to a $575,000 settlement after months of heavily armed police responses to 911 calls to the couple’s home that officials knew were hoaxes.
John Bradley, a lawyer for the couple, acknowledged that the Milwaukee police “did their job on the first few swatting calls.”
“The problem,” he added, “came after it had happened dozens of times.”
-
Wisconsin police chief sued 3x, accused of unconstitutional stops
A sheriff’s deputy and small-town police chief, Brendan Cutrell, is the subject of three federal lawsuits alleging he violated the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals he pulled over.
-
TMJ4 Lighthouse Investigation – City of Milwaukee Settles $575,000 Swatting Lawsuit
TMJ4's Investigative Report about the City of Milwaukee Settling a Civil Rights Lawsuit by Niki Robinson and Patrick Tomlinson for $575,000 For MPD's Relentless Swatting of Their Home.
-
Milwaukee couple reaches $575,000 settlement with city after repeated swatting responses
After years of harassment, frustration, and danger, a Milwaukee couple is poised to receive a settlement payment from the City of Milwaukee. The city has agreed to pay the $575,000 settlement for not properly training 20 officers involved.
-
City may pay $575,000 to settle MPD ‘swatting’ lawsuit involving local author
Milwaukee City Attorney Evan Goyke is recommending that the city pay more than half a million dollars to settle a federal lawsuit over the Milwaukee Police Department repeatedly entering and searching a local author’s home in response to false 911 calls.
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man on federal charges after posting TikTok videos
CNN has reached out to Stanton’s attorney for comment.
In a statement to the New York Times, John Bradley, a lawyer for Stanton, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
Strang Bradley defends Wisconsin man facing federal charges related to ICE agents
In a statement, John Bradley, a lawyer for Mr. Stanton, a Marine Corps veteran who served in the Iraq War, said: “It is important to remember that the contents of a criminal complaint represent one side of the story and are just allegations. Mr. Stanton pled not guilty. He is presumed innocent, and we will vigorously defend against these charges in court.”
-
County, city, several officers named in civil rights lawsuit
A Rhinelander man has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, alleging seven Oneida County sheriff’s deputies and two city police officers violated his civil rights by engaging in an illegal search and seizure, unreasonable extension of seizure, unlawful arrest and failure to intervene.
-
Shorewood woman receives $760K civil rights settlement from City of Milwaukee
Stephanie Rapkin has been awarded a $760,000 settlement after suing Shorewood and Whitefish Bay over her arrest in 2020 where police conducted a search of her home without a warrant. “To our knowledge, this is the largest police misconduct civil rights settlement in Wisconsin that doesn’t involve a death or serious injury,” John Bradley, one of Rapkin’s attorneys, told the Journal Sentinel.
Our Team
Strang Bradley’s Civil Rights Lawyers
Answers
Wrongful Conviction FAQs
-
How much can a Wisconsin exoneree receive from the state?
Federal civil rights claims against those responsible have no limit.
-
Can I bring a federal claim and seek state compensation?
Often yes. State compensation under § 775.05 and a federal § 1983 claim for fabricated evidence or misconduct are separate paths that can sometimes both be pursued.
-
What does it take to overturn a conviction?
Depending on the error, options include direct appeal, post-conviction motions, DNA testing petitions, ineffective-assistance claims, and federal habeas. We work with innocence resources to pursue every avenue.
Were you wrongfully convicted? Let’s talk.
Consultations are free and confidential. Tell us what happened and we will tell you how we can help.
