Civil Rights & Police Misconduct

Wisconsin Illegal Search Lawyers

Your Home, Your Car, and Your Body Are Protected from Unreasonable Government Searches

Your Home, Your Car, and Your Body Are Protected from Unreasonable Government Searches

The Fourth Amendment guarantees your right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Police generally need a valid warrant or a recognized exception (such as consent) before they can search your home, your vehicle, your phone, or your person. When they ignore that requirement, it is not just a legal technicality — it is a violation of your fundamental constitutional rights.

At Strang Bradley, we represent people across Wisconsin who have been subjected to unlawful searches, and we use the law to hold law enforcement accountable for that conduct.

What Makes a Search Illegal?

A search is illegal when it is conducted without a valid warrant and without a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, or when the warrant itself was defective. Common unlawful search scenarios include:

  • Warrantless entry into a home without consent, exigency, or hot pursuit
  • Vehicle searches beyond the scope of a valid traffic stop
  • Body searches or strip searches without legal justification
  • Phone or device searches without a warrant (see Riley v. California)
  • Searches based on a warrant obtained through false or misleading information in the affidavit
  • Searches that exceed the scope of a lawful warrant

The Criminal Case vs. The Civil Rights Case

If you were charged with a crime following an illegal search, suppression of that evidence (the exclusionary rule) is handled in your criminal case. But the illegal search itself — the constitutional violation — is a separate harm for which you may be entitled to civil damages. You do not need to have been criminally charged to bring a civil rights claim for an unlawful search.

What to Do If You Were Subjected to an Illegal Search

  1. Do not physically resist or obstruct the search, even if you believe it is unlawful. Assert your rights verbally and calmly.
  2. Write down exactly what happened, what officers said, and how the search was justified (if any justification was given) as soon as possible.
  3. Document any damage to your property caused during the search.
  4. Contact Strang Bradley to evaluate your civil rights claim.

Constitutional and Wisconsin Law

Illegal search claims are brought under the Fourth Amendment through 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Wisconsin’s own constitution (Article I, Section 11) also protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. In addition to the individual officers, municipalities can be held liable if the unlawful search reflects an official policy or a widespread practice.

Compensation You May Be Entitled To From An Illegal Search

  • Compensation for emotional distress, humiliation, and trauma
  • Property damage caused during the search
  • Lost wages if you were detained as a result
  • Compensation for the constitutional violation itself
  • Punitive damages in egregious cases
  • Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Why Choose Strang Bradley for Your Illegal Search Case

Our attorneys have deep experience in both criminal defense and civil rights law — a combination that is uniquely valuable in illegal search cases. We understand how to analyze search warrant affidavits, challenge the legal basis for warrantless searches, and present Fourth Amendment violations compellingly to juries and judges.

Strang Bradley’s History of Winning Unreasonable Search Cases

A selection of the unreasonable search cases the firm has recently filed, won on summary judgment, and obtained judgments in.

Recent Cases Filed

  • Achterling v. Polk County et al

    No. 3:25-CV-00386 (W.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 5/14/25

    Defendants: Polk County, Troy Olson, and Torsten Swanson

    Claims:

    View Filed Complaint

  • Cousineau v. City of Milwaukee et al

    No. 2:25-CV-01541 (E.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 10/7/25

    Defendants: City of Milwaukee and Aaron W. Froh, Jr.

    Claims:

    View Filed Complaint

  • Grulke v. City of West Bend et al

    No. 2:25-CV-00697 (E.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 5/13/25

    Defendants: City of West Bend and Montana Luecking

    Claims:
    • Count 1: Unlawful Search
    • Count 2: Indemnification Claim Against City of West Bend

    View Filed Complaint

  • Holbrook v. City of Milwaukee et al

    No. 2:25-CV-00970 (E.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 7/8/25

    Defendants: City of Milwaukee, Omar Contreras, and Rafael Perez

    Claims:

    View Filed Complaint

Summary Judgment Wins

  • Faison v. Wagas

    No. 3:25-CV-00002 (W.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 1/2/25

    Defendants: Rolly Wagas

    Claims:

    Date of Summary Judgment Decision: 4/17/26

    Won Count 1 (Unlawful Search). Judge William M. Conley concluded the defendant violated the plaintiff’s 4th Amendment rights.

    View Filed Complaint View Summary Judgment Decision

  • Furdge v. City of Monona

    No. 3:20-cv-00846 (W.D. Wis.)

    Defendants: City of Monona, Jared Wedig, Luke Wunsch

    Date of Summary Judgment Decision: 2/16/22

    Won Warrantless Entry and Unlawful Seizure. Judge James D. Peterson concluded the officers violated the plaintiff’s 4th Amendment rights.

    View Filed Complaint View Summary Judgment Decision

  • Jackson v. City of Milwaukee

    No. 2:22-cv-00121 (E.D. Wis.)

    Defendants: City of Milwaukee, Nora R. Burlo, Tyler J. Seelow

    Date of Summary Judgment Decision: 5/18/23

    Won Warrantless Search of Residence and Unlawful Seizure. Judge William E. Duffin concluded the officers violated the plaintiffs’ 4th Amendment rights.

    View Filed Complaint View Summary Judgment Decision

Judgments Obtained

  • Carter v. City of New Berlin et al

    No. 2:25-CV-01719 (E.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 11/4/25

    Defendants: City of New Berlin, Lisette Ceballos, Melissa Romenesko, and Stacey Howard

    Claims:

    Date of Judgment: April 17, 2026

    Judgment entered for plaintiff Richard Carter against the City of New Berlin, Lisette Ceballos, Melissa Romenesko, and Stacey Howard.

    View Filed Complaint View Judgment

  • Hawkins v. City of Kenosha et al

    No. 2:26-CV-00384 (E.D. Wis.)

    Date Case Filed: 3/10/26

    Defendants: City of Kenosha, Michael O’Neil, Matthew Lovell, Anthony Beck, Justin Labatore, and Caden Kreuser

    Claims:

    Date of Judgment: August 17, 2026

    Judgment entered for plaintiffs Erica Hawkins against the City of Kenosha, Michael O’Neil, Matthew Lovell, Anthony Beck, Justin Labatore, and Caden Kreuser.

    View Filed Complaint View Judgment

In the news

Answers

Illegal Search FAQs

  • Can I sue for an illegal search if I was never charged?

    Yes. The unlawful search is its own constitutional harm. You do not need to have been charged or convicted to bring a civil rights claim.

  • Is suppressing the evidence the same as a civil claim?

    No. Suppression happens in your criminal case; the civil rights claim seeks damages for the violation itself, and the two are handled separately.

  • What if police had a warrant?

    A warrant can still be invalid — for example, if it was based on false information or police searched beyond its scope. Those searches can still be unlawful.

Did Police Enter Your Home? Let’s talk.

Consultations are free and confidential. Tell us what happened and we will tell you how we can help.